[Back] [Score -1] As a practical matter, this is almost as good a result as your proposal to require that Pennsylvania be the governing law and jurisdiction. In the absence of an express provision, it is likely that the result will be the same; ie. since the buyer is in Pennsylvania and the system is to be delivered, installed and used in Pennsylvania, a court is likely to determine that Pennsylvania interests predominate and Permit the hospital to have more than 30 days after termination in which to cease using and destroy or return the software.ia court would have jurisdiction. The one danger is the possibility that a court determines that BHS has insufficient ties to Pennsylvania to assert jurisdiction over it. This means that General Hospital would have to go to California should it be the party commencing the lawsuit.
Biddle & Colletti: Website home Sitemap